Data from two configurable rules with same target POV should get aggregated or replaced?
Summary:
We are facing an issue with configurable rules, wherein the data from two configurable rules with same target POV are getting aggregated instead of getting replaced.
Content (please ensure you mask any confidential information):
We are experiencing an issue in our consolidation process related to the behavior of two configurable consolidation rules:
The configurable rule under both the rule sets has the same target POV. Considering that, the data which is calculated at minority interest should be replaced by the rule later in sequence. However, currently it is being aggregated.
Version (include the version you are using, if applicable):
Tagged:
0